고시닷컴
베리타스 법학원
고객센터
입금계좌
배송안내
오후 3시 이전 구매
주말,공휴일 발송 제외
이용안내
자주하는 질문
묻고답하기
수험자료실
장바구니
주문/배송조회
민사소송법상품 상세설명
■ 책소개 ■
포항 냉수리 신라비 국보 제 호 에는 대에 걸쳐 이어진 ( 264 ) 3 재산분쟁의 종지부를 찍는 판결문
이 기록되어 있습니다. 지증왕은 전대의 두 왕이 결정한 절거리라는 사람의 재산취득에 관한
사항을 다시 한 번 확인하고 그 결정사항을 집행하도록 한 사실을 비석에 남겼습니다. 매듭
짓는 과정이 없다면 분쟁은 계속 반복될 것입니다. 그런데 1500년 전처럼 사건마다 왕이 비
석을 세우지 않아도 되도록 하는 것이 절차법입니다. 분쟁을 매듭짓는 과정이 절차법이라고
한다면 절차법인 민사소송법이 사례와 함께 호흡하는 관계라는 것은 자명합니다.
그래서 개념을 설명하는 방식만으로는 민사소송법의 정확한 내용을 전달하는데 한계가 있습
니다. 저자가 기본서인 ‘민사소송법의 맥’을 집필하면서 ‘민사소송법 사례의 맥’과 연동하여
‘핵심사례’를 수록한 것도 이런 이유에서입니다. 민사소송법의 맥으로 수학한 독자라면 민사
소송법 사례의 맥을 통해 민사소송법의 개념을 되새기는 시너지효과까지 거둘 수 있을 것입
니다.
본서의 특징은 아래와 같습니다.
1. 주요 기출사례 및 판례사례 정리
변호사시험, 사법시험, 법원행시, 법무사시험, 5급공채 법무행정고시, 변리사시험 2차 주관식
기출뿐만 아니라 주요 최신판례까지 약 200여 개의 사례가 진도별로 정리되었습니다. 각 사
례에는 기본서인 민사소송법의 맥에 수록된 ‘핵심사례’에 해당하는 사례번호를 표시하여 기본
서와 사례집의 유기적인 활용이 가능하게 하였습니다.
2. 변호사시험 및 사법시험, 법원행시, 법무사, 5급공채, 변리사 기출표시
사례번호 옆에 기출표시를 해 두어 스스로 중요도를 확인할 수 있게끔 하였습니다. 이로써
변호사시험 뿐만 아니라 법원행정고시, 법무사시험, 5급공채 법무행정직렬, 변리사시험을 준
비하시는 수험생들에게도 합격의 이정표가 되도록 했습니다.
3. 필수암기 사항 두문자 표시 및 결론 표시
암기에 도움이 될 수 있도록 꼭 필요한 내용에 대해서는 두문자를 표시해 두었고, 목차 옆에
결론을 표시하여 반복 학습할 때에 속도를 낼 수 있도록 했습니다.
4. 2017.10.31.시행되는 개정 민사소송법을 모두 반영하였으며 2017년 하반기 중요판례까지
반영
5. 절제된 분량 360page로 민사소송법 사례형 완벽대비
중복되는 문제를 통합하고, 앞의 사례와 반복되는 논점은 참조표시만 하여 분량을 줄였습니
다. 기본서인 민사소송법의 맥으로 공부한 독자라면 반복 학습하는 효과가 배가될 것입니다.
변호사시험 전부와 각종 주요고시의 10년간 기출사례, 향후 출제가 유력한 최신판례까지 망
라하였으므로 더 이상의 사례풀이 욕심은 과욕이라고 생각합니다. 저자가 분량의 부담을 줄
이기 위해 노력한 것은 독자가 본서를 수회 반복 학습하여 사례풀이 능력을 체화(體化)하도
록 하기 위함입니다.
■ 목 차 ■
제1편 총 론
제2편 소송의 주체
[사례 001] 법관의 제척·기피(1) ·································································································
2011년 제2회 법무부모의 변형
[사례 002] 법관의 제척·기피(2) ································································································· 2
2016년 법원행정고시
[사례 003] 법관의 제척·기피(3) ································································································· 3
2001년 변리사 유사
[사례 004] 국제재판관할권의 결정기준···················································································· 4
대판 2013.7.12. 2006다17539
[사례 005] 전속적 토지관할합의가 다른 나라의 재판권을 배제하는지 여부 ······· 6
2014년 변리사
[사례 006] 관련재판적······················································································································ 9
2017년 6월 법전협 모의
[사례 007] 합의관할(1) ··················································································································· 12
2012년 제1회 변호사시험
[사례 008] 합의관할(2) - 관할합의 효력의 주관적 범위··············································· 16
2017년 사법시험
[사례 009] 합의관할(3) - 관할합의 효력의 주관적 범위··············································· 17
2012년 제1회 변호사시험
[사례 010] 이송결정의 적법여부······························································································· 17
2013년 변리사
[사례 011] 심판편의에 의한 이송····························································································· 18
2017년 사법시험
[사례 012] 전속관할을 위반한 이송결정의 구속력 인정여부······································· 20
대결 1995.5.15. 94마1059,1060
[사례 013] 당사자 확정과 당사자표시정정(1) ··································································· 21
[사례 014] 당사자 확정과 당사자표시정정(2) ··································································· 22
2009년 사법시험
[사례 015] 제소전 사망(1) ············································································································ 24
2016년 제5회 변호사시험, 2014년 8월 법전협 모의
[사례 016] 제소전 사망(2) ············································································································ 26
2014년 8월 법전협 모의
[사례 017] 소송계속 중 당사자의 사망(1) ············································································ 27
[사례 018] 소송계속 중 당사자의 사망(2) ············································································ 29
2016년 제5회 변호사시험
[사례 019] 소송계속 중 당사자의 사망(3) ············································································ 30
2013년 제2회 변호사시험
[사례 020] 당사자가 소송대리인에게 소송위임을 한 다음 소 제기 전에 사망한
경우································································································································· 32
대판 2016.4.29. 2014다210449 변형
[사례 021] 비법인사단의 당사자적격······················································································ 34
2012년 8월 법전협 모의, 2009년 사법시험
[사례 022] 조합의 소송수행방안······························································································· 35
2009년 사법시험, 2012년 8월 법전협 모의, 2011년 법무부 모의
[사례 023] 당사자적격(1) - 이행의 소에서 당사자적격·················································· 37
2007년 법무사, 2016년 제5회 2014년 제3회 변호사시험
[사례 024] 당사자적격(2) - 말소등기청구의 피고적격···················································· 37
2015년 사법시험, 2013년 10월 법전협 모의
[사례 025] 당사자적격(3) ··············································································································· 38
대판 2015.12.10. 2014다87878
[사례 026] 당사자적격(4) - 저당권이전의 부기등기 말소청구···································· 39
2013년 제2회 변호사시험
[사례 027] 당사자적격(5) ··············································································································· 40
2015년 제4회 변호사시험
[사례 028] 당사자적격(6) - 채권자대위소송의 법적성질과 당사자적격·················· 41
2009년 법원행정고시, 2017년 사법시험, 2012년 제1회 변호사시험, 2011년 7월
법전협 모의
[사례 029] 당사자적격(7) - 추심명령과 당사자적격························································· 42
2011년 7월·2017년 10월 법전협 모의, 2014년 제3회 변호사시험
[사례 030] 당사자적격(8) - 채권자취소소송의 피고적격················································ 44
2012년 8월·2013년 6월·10월 법전협 모의, 2015년 사법시험
[사례 031] 당사자적격(9) - 채권자취소소송의 피고적격················································ 45
2015년 사법시험
[사례 032] 당사자적격(10) - 단체 내부 분쟁에서 피고적격········································ 45
2012년 사법시험, 2009년 법무행정고시
[사례 033] 소송능력························································································································ 47
[사례 034] 의사무능력과 특별대리인 선임신청·································································· 49
2007년 변리사변형
[사례 035] 대리권 소멸통지(1) ··································································································· 50
2016년 제5회 변호사시험, 2014년 법무행정고시, 2010년 변리사
[사례 036] 대리권 소멸통지(2) ··································································································· 51
2014년 법무행정고시
[사례 037] 파기환송 후 환송 전 항소심 대리인의 대리권 부활여부······················· 52
대판 1984.6.14. 84다카744
[사례 038] 표현대리 인정여부 및 무권대리의 경우 일부추인 가부························· 54
2013년 사법시험
제3편 제1심 소송절차
[사례 039] 공유물분할의 소········································································································ 56
2014년 사법시험, 2015년 8월 법전협 모의
[사례 040] 경계확정의 소(1) ········································································································ 57
대판 1993.10.8. 92다44503, 대판 1996.4.23. 95다5476
[사례 041] 경계확정의 소(2) ········································································································ 58
2012년 변리사
[사례 042] 현재이행의 소에서 소의이익 - 채권이 가압류된 경우···························· 61
2011년 7월 법전협 모의, 2012년 제1회 2014년 제3회 변호사시험
[사례 043] 장래이행의 소(1) - 물건인도청구와 대상청구의 병합····························· 63
대판 2006.3.10. 2005다55411
[사례 044] 장래이행의 소(2) - 불법점유로 인한 부당이득반환청구························· 64
2006년 변리사
[사례 045] 확인의 소의 적법요건····························································································· 66
2015년 10월 법전협 모의
[사례 046] 확인의 이익················································································································· 67
대판 2010.7.15. 2010다2428,2435
[사례 047] 증서진부확인의 소(1) ······························································································· 69
2013년 변리사
[사례 048] 증서진부확인의 소(2) ······························································································· 70
2013년 변리사
[사례 049] 소송요건의 존부판단······························································································· 71
대판 2015.9.10. 2013다55300
[사례 050] 무변론판결제도··········································································································· 72
2014년 10월 법전협 모의
[사례 051] 중복소송금지(1) - 상계항변과 중복소제기···················································· 74
2011년 사법시험, 2013년 8월 법전협 모의, 2009년 변리사
8
[사례 052] 중복소송금지(2) - 채권자취소소송과 중복소제기······································· 75
2018년 제7회 변호사시험
[사례 053] 중복소송금지(3) - 채권자대위소송과 중복소제기······································· 77
2012년 제1회 변호사시험, 2012년 8월 2015년 6월 법전협 모의, 2012년
사법시험
[사례 054] 중복소송금지 (4) - 채무자가 제소한 후 압류채권자의 추심소송······· 78
2014년 사법시험
[사례 055] 중복소송금지(5) ·········································································································· 80
2016년 8월 법전협 모의
[사례 056] 처분권주의(1) - 일부청구와 과실상계····························································· 80
2014년 8월 법전협 모의, 2011년 법무사시험
[사례 057] 처분권주의(2) - 일부청구와 과실상계····························································· 82
2011년 법무사
[사례 058] 처분권주의(3) - 단순이행청구에 대한 선이행판결의 가능성················ 83
2013년 제2회 변호사시험, 2014년 6월 법전협 모의. 2006년 사법시험
[사례 059] 처분권주의(4) - 채무일부부존재확인의 소···················································· 85
2007년 변리사
[사례 060] 처분권주의(5) - 단순이행청구에 대한 상환이행판결································ 87
2011년 7월 2012년 8월 법전협 모의, 2007년 사법시험
[사례 061] 변론주의(1) - 소송자료와 증거자료의 구별·················································· 89
2010년 사법시험
[사례 062] 변론주의(2) - 주요사실과 간접사실의 구별·················································· 91
2016년 6월 법전협 모의
[사례 063] 변론주의(3) - 주장책임(소멸시효의 기간 및 기산점), 유권대리 주장에
표현대리의 주장이 포함되어 있는지 여부···················································· 93
2013년 제2회 변호사시험, 2010년도 제1회 법무부 모의, 2009년 2015년
사법시험
[사례 064] 적시제출주의 - 실기한 공격방어방법의 각하·············································· 96
2010년 사법시험 변형
[사례 065] 부인과 항변(1) ············································································································ 98
2006년·2015년 사법시험, 2015년 법무행정고시
[사례 066] 부인과 항변(2) ·········································································································· 100
2015년 법무행정고시
[사례 067] 소송에 있어서 형성권의 행사(1) - 상계항변의 법적성질····················· 102
2016년 8월 법전협 모의, 2011년 1월 법무부 모의
[사례 068] 소송에 있어서 형성권의 행사(2) - 상계항변의 법적성질····················· 104
[사례 069] 소송에 있어서 형성권의 행사(3) - 상계항변에 대한 상계의 재항변· 104
2015년 법무행정고시
[사례 070] 소송상 합의 - 부제소합의와 지적의무························································· 106
2013년 8월 법전협 모의, 2014년 사법시험, 2014년 변리사
[사례 071] 조건부 소취하계약·································································································· 108
2017년 6월 법전협 모의
[사례 072] 소송상 합의··············································································································· 110
2013년 8월 법전협 모의
[사례 073] 소송행위의 철회와 취소(1) ················································································· 111
2014년 법원행정고시, 2009년 사법시험
[사례 074] 소송행위의 철회와 취소(2) ················································································· 112
2014년 변리사
[사례 075] 소송상 합의, 양쪽 당사자의 결석··································································· 114
2015년 8월 법전협 모의
[사례 076] 한쪽 당사자의 결석 - 진술간주, 자백간주················································· 116
2015년 변리사
[사례 077] 불출석 자백간주······································································································ 118
2015년 사법시험, 2017년 법무사
[사례 078] 위법한 공시송달과 구제책·················································································· 121
2012년 변리사
[사례 079] 보충송달, 송달의 하자와 구제책, 하자의 치유········································· 123
2016년 사법시험, 2012년 변리사
[사례 080] 송달과 지급명령······································································································ 127
2013년 법원행정고시
[사례 081] 재판상 자백(1) - 선결적 법률관계에 대한 자백, 자백의 철회·········· 129
2014년 제3회 변호사시험, 2011년 7월·2013년 10월·2014년 6월 법전협 모의
[사례 082] 재판상 자백(2) - 선행자백의 구속력····························································· 130
2017년 8월 법전협 모의
[사례 083] 재판상 자백(3) - 선행자백의 구속력····························································· 133
2017년 법원행정고시
[사례 084] 문서의 진정성립에 대한 재판상 자백, 문서의 형식적 증거력(1) ····· 134
2018년 제7회 변호사시험
[사례 085] 재판상 자백 - 법률용어를 사용한 당사자의 진술, 문서의 형식적
증거력(2) ····················································································································· 136
2013년 제2회 변호사시험, 2015년 6월 2011년 7월 법전협 모의
[사례 086] 재판상 자백, 문서의 형식적 증거력(3) ························································· 140
2015년 6월 법전협 모의
[사례 087] 문서의 형식적 증거력(4) - 사문서의 진정성립의 추정과 그 복멸·· 143
2008년 사법시험, 2015년 변리사
[사례 088] 문서의 형식적 증거력(5) - 문서의 진정성립에 대한 자백, 사본의
증거력·························································································································· 145
2012년 법무행정고시
[사례 089] 문서의 실질적 증거력··························································································· 148
2010년 사법시험, 2013년 법무행정고시
[사례 090] 처분문서의 증거력·································································································· 149
2017년 법무행정고시
[사례 091] 처분문서의 실질적 증거력, 문서제출명령 부준수의 효과···················· 151
2013년 법무행정고시
[사례 092] 증거보전, 문서제출명령······················································································· 153
2009년 변리사
[사례 093] 증인신문······················································································································ 155
2012년 변리사
[사례 094] 채권자 대위소송과 증명책임············································································· 156
2011년 변리사
[사례 095] 등기의 추정력과 증명책임·················································································· 158
2003년 사법시험
제4편 소송의 종료
[사례 096] 소취하와 재소금지 ······························································································· 162
2014년 6월 8월 법전협 모의, 2010년 사법시험, 2014년 변리사
[사례 097] 채권자대위소송과 재소금지, 선결관계의 경우 재소금지원칙의
적용여부······················································································································ 164
2011년 사법시험
[사례 098] 재판상 화해의 법적성질······················································································ 167
[사례 099] 재판상 화해와 중복제소······················································································ 169
2008년 법무행정고시
[사례 100] 기판력의 본질(1) ······································································································ 170
사법 연수원 사례
[사례 101] 기판력의 본질(2) ······································································································ 171
사법 연수원 사례
[사례 102] 소송판결의 기판력·································································································· 172
사법 연수원 사례
[사례 103] 기판력의 시적범위 (1) ·························································································· 173
사법 연수원 사례
[사례 104] 기판력의 시적범위(2) - 표준시 전에 발생한 형성권의 변론종결 후의
행사······························································································································· 174
2007년 사법시험
[사례 105] 기판력의 시적범위와 청구이의의 소······························································ 176
2014년 8월 법전협 모의
[사례 106] 기판력의 시적범위 - 변종 전 한정승인 사실 실권여부······················· 177
대판 2006.10.13, 2006다23138
[사례 107] 정기금판결에 대한 변경의 소··········································································· 179
2016년 6월 법전협 모의
[사례 108] 기대여명연장으로 인한 추가청구···································································· 180
2013년 법무행정고시
[사례 109] 기대여명보다 일찍 사망한 경우와 기대여명이 연장된 경우의 구별182
2016년 법무사
[사례 110] 추가청구와 변경의 소··························································································· 185
2007년 사법시험
[사례 111] 말소등기청구소송에서의 소송물······································································· 186
2008년 사법시험
[사례 112] 기판력의 객관적 범위(1) - 판결이유 중의 판단(선결적 법률관계) ·· 187
2016년 8월 법전협 모의
[사례 113] 기판력의 객관적 범위(2) - 판결이유 중의 판단(모순적 법률관계) ·· 189
2010년 사법시험 변형
[사례 114] 기판력의 객관적 범위(3) - 판결이유 중의 판단(모순적 법률관계) ·· 192
사법연수원 사례
[사례 115] 기판력의 객관적 범위(4) - 일부청구와 기판력 저촉여부····················· 193
2012년 제1회 변호사시험
[사례 116] 기판력의 객관적 범위(5) - 일부청구의 소송물········································· 195
2012년 제1회 변호사시험, 2014년 8월 법전협 모의, 2010년 법무사, 2002년 사법시험
[사례 117] 기판력의 객관적 범위(6) - 일부청구의 소송물········································· 196
2017년 법원행정고시
[사례 118] 기판력의 객관적 범위(7) - 토지의 특정일부, 지분 매수주장············ 198
사법연수원 사례
[사례 119] 기판력의 객관적 범위(8) - 진정명의회복을 위한 소유권이전등기청구와
말소등기청구············································································································· 200
2002년 변리사
[사례 120] 기판력의 객관적 범위(9) - 판결이유 중의 판단(상계항변) ·················· 201
사법연수원 사례, 2017년 10월 법전협 모의, 2013년 법원행정고시
[사례 121] 기판력의 작용(1) - 선결관계, 모순관계························································ 204
2015년 제4회 변호사시험
[사례 122] 기판력의 작용(2) - 선결관계, 모순관계························································ 207
사법연수원 사례
[사례 123] 기판력의 주관적 범위(1) ······················································································ 208
2014년 사법시험
[사례 124] 기판력의 주관적 범위(2) ······················································································ 210
2016년 8월 법전협 모의
[사례 125] 기판력의 주관적 범위(3) - 변론종결 후 승계인에 대한 법원의 조치···· 211
2017년 10월 법전협모의
[사례 126] 채권자대위소송과 기판력(1) ··············································································· 213
대판 2014.1.23. 2011다108095
[사례 127] 채권자대위소송과 기판력(2) ··············································································· 214
2015년 제4회 변호사시험
[사례 128] 채권자대위소송과 기판력(3) ··············································································· 215
2016년 2015년 변호사시험, 2015년 법전협 모의, 2012년 사법시험
[사례 129] 채권자대위소송과 기판력 (4) - 채무자의 확정판결의 효력이
대위채권자에게 미치는지 여부 ········································································ 218
대판 1993.3.26. 92다32876
[사례 130] 채권자취소소송 관련 사례·················································································· 219
2010년 법무사
[사례 131] 판결의 편취(1) ·········································································································· 220
2015년 10월 법전협 모의, 2012년 법무행정고시
[사례 132] 편취판결에 대한 소송법적 구제수단······························································ 223
2017년 8월 법전협 모의, 2014년 법무사
[사례 133] 판결의 편취(2) ·········································································································· 225
2015년 10월 법전협 모의
제5편 병합소송
[사례 134] 물건의 인도청구와 대상청구············································································· 228
대판 2011.8.18. 2011다30666
[사례 135] 재판누락, 변론주의································································································ 229
2011년 7월 법전협 모의변형
[사례 136] 선택적 병합··············································································································· 231
2011년 법원행정고시
[사례 137] (진정)예비적 병합, 불이익변경금지원칙························································ 235
2014년 6월 법전협 모의
[사례 138] 부진정예비적병합의 인정여부(1) ······································································ 237
2016년 6월 법전협 모의, 2010년 2014년 법원행정고시
[사례 139] 부진정예비적병합의 인정여부(2) ······································································ 239
2014년 법원행정고시
[사례 140] 청구의 교환적 변경과 재소금지······································································· 241
2014년 변리사
[사례 141] 채권자취소소송 - 피보전채권의 변경이 소변경인지 여부··················· 243
2013년 6월 법전협 모의
[사례 142] 채권자대위소송과 소변경 - 대위채권자가 피대위채권을 양수한 경우·· 244
대판 2010.6.24. 2010다17284
[사례 143] 반소(1) - 상호관련성, 항소심에서의 반소··················································· 246
대판 1996.3.26. 95다45545
[사례 144] 반소(2) - 예비적 반소(예비적 반소와 본소의 각하판결에 대하여 원고
만 항소한경우 항소심의 이심의 범위와 심판의 대상) ·························· 248
2016년 사법시험
[사례 145] 반소(3) - 본소취하시 반소청구의 적법성···················································· 250
2012년 제1회 변호사시험
[사례 146] 반소(4) - 반소의 이익··························································································· 251
2013년 제2회 변호사시험, 2011년 6월 법전협 모의
[사례 147] 반소(5) - 반소의 이익··························································································· 252
2011년 7월 법전협 모의
[사례 148] 반소(6) - 반소제기에 의해 본소의 소의 이익이 소멸되는지 여부·· 253
대판 2010.7.15. 2010다2428
[사례 149] 필수적 공동소송과 통상 공동소송의 구별·················································· 253
2014년 제3회 변호사시험
[사례 150] 통상공동소송(1) - 공동소송인 독립의 원칙과 그 수정························· 255
2011년 사법시험
[사례 151] 통상공동소송(2) - 공동소송인 독립의 원칙················································ 258
2015년 6월 법전협 모의
[사례 152] 통상공동소송(3) - 공동소송인 독립의 원칙과 그 수정························· 259
2013년 8월 법전협 모의
[사례 153] 통상공동소송(4) - 공동소송인 독립의 원칙과 그 수정························· 261
2018년 제7회 변호사시험
[사례 154] 통상공동소송인의 추가 가부 - 수인이 공동매수인으로서 매매예약을
체결한 경우의 법률관계 ····················································································· 264
2016년 제5회 변호사시험
[사례 155] 고유필수적 공동소송(1) - 장래이행의 소···················································· 266
2017년 10월 법전협모의
[사례 156] 고유필수적 공동소송(2) 심판방법······························································· 268
2013년 6월 법전협 모의, 2013년 법무사, 2010년 사법시험
[사례 157] 고유필수적 공동소송(3) - 1인의 소취하 가부··········································· 270
2010년 사법시험
[사례 158] 고유필수적 공동소송(4) - 누락된 공동소송인 보정방법······················· 271
2014년 사법시험
[사례 159] 유사필수적 공동소송····························································································· 273
2012년 법원행정고시, 2015년 변리사
[사례 160] 예비적 공동소송(1) - 법률상 양립불가능의 의미···································· 274
2015년 제4회 변호사시험
[사례 161] 예비적 공동소송(2) ································································································· 276
2007년·2014년 법원행정고등시, 2007년·2011년 사법시험
[사례 162] 예비적 공동소송(3) ································································································· 278
2015년 8월 법전협 모의
[사례 163] 예비적 공동소송(4) - 예비적 공동소송인의 추가, 예비적 피고의 인낙
가부 ······························································································································ 279
2007년·2011년 2013년 사법시험, 2009년 법무행정고시
[사례 164] 선정당사자제도(1) - 공동의 이해관계··························································· 280
2002년 법무사시험
[사례 165] 선정당사자제도(2) - 심급한정의 선정 가부················································ 282
대결 1995.10.5. 94마2452, 대판 2014.10.15. 2013다25781
[사례 166] 보조참가(1) - 요건, 참가인의 지위, 참가적 효력···································· 285
대결 2014.5.29. 2014마4009, 2009년 사법시험
[사례 167] 보조참가(2) - 보조참가인의 항소제기··························································· 291
2012년 제1회 변호사시험, 2017년 6월 법전협 모의
[사례 168] 보조참가(3) - 참가적 효력·················································································· 292
2008년 사법시험
[사례 169] 보조참가(4) - 보조참가인의 지위···································································· 294
2017년 6월 법전협 모의
[사례 170] 보조참가(5) - 공동불법행위에서 가해자의 보조참가······························ 297
2015년 8월 법전협 모의, 2015년 법원행정고시
[사례 171] 공동소송적 보조참가 - 채권자대위소송에서 채무자의 참가, 공동소송적
보조참가인의 지위 ································································································· 298
2006년 사법시험
[사례 172] 공동소송참가(1) - 채권자대위소송에서 다른 채권자의 공동소송참가·· 300
대판 2015.7.23. 2013다30301
[사례 173] 공동소송참가(2) - 주주대표소송에 회사의 공동소송참가 가부········· 302
대판 2002.3.15. 2000다9086
[사례 174] 독립당사자참가(1) - 권리주장참가의 참가이유, 원·피고만의 일부 화해 가부,
참가신청을 각하한 제1심판결에 대하여 참가인만이 항소한 경우······· 303
2013년 변리사
[사례 175] 독립당사자참가(2) - 불이익변경금지원칙이 배제되는 경우················ 308
2008년 사법시험
[사례 176] 독립당사자참가(3) - 불이익변경금지원칙이 배제되는 경우················ 310
2015년 법무행정고시
[사례 177] 독립당사자참가(4) - 항소심의 심판범위······················································· 311
2015년 법무행정고시
[사례 178] 독립당사자참가(5) - 사해방지참가·································································· 312
대판 1997.6.27. 95다40977
[사례 179] 독립당사자참가(6) - 편면참가 가부, 사해방지참가와 채권자취소권 315
2017년 제6회 변호사시험
[사례 180] 임의적 당사자의 변경(1) - 피고경정····························································· 317
대결 1997.10.17. 97마1632
[사례 181] 임의적 당사자의 변경(2) - 피고경정····························································· 318
2014년 10월 법전협 모의
[사례 182] 원고경정의 허용여부····························································································· 319
대판 2008.6.12. 2008다11276
[사례 183] 임의적 당사자의 변경, 소송승계(1) - 당사자의 변경, 추가방법······· 320
2014년 6월 법전협
[사례 184] 임의적 당사자의 변경, 소송승계(2) - 당사자의 변경, 추가방법······· 322
2011년 변리사
[사례 185] 제3자의 당사자로서의 소송참가 유형 - 공동소송참가, 독립당사자참가,
참가승계 ····················································································································· 323
2015년 10월 법전협 모의
[사례 186] 인수승계- 계쟁물양도에 있어서 승계인······················································· 326
2014년 법무행정고시, 2004년 2007년 변리사, 2016년 제5회 변호사시험,
2014년 사법시험, 2014년 10월 2015년 6월 법전협 모의
[사례 187] 인수승계(1) ················································································································· 327
2015년 6월 법전협 모의
[사례 188] 인수승계(2) ················································································································· 328
2014년 10월 법전협 모의
[사례 189] 인수승계(3) - 소송승계 후 의무자가 아님이 밝혀진 경우·················· 329
2007년 사법시험
[사례 190] 인수승계(4) - 소송승계 후 의무자가 아님이 밝혀진 경우·················· 330
2017년 10월 법전협 모의
[사례 191] 참가승계(1) - 참가 후의 소송형태, 당사자 일방의 소송탈퇴에 대한
상대방의 부동의시 법원의 판단방법 ···························································· 331
2014년 10월 법전협 모의, 2012년 법원행정고시
[사례 192] 참가승계(2) - 참가 후의 소송형태, 당사자 일방의 소송탈퇴에 대한
상대방의 부동의시 법원의 판단방법 ···························································· 333
2014년 10월 법전협 모의
[사례 193] 당연승계 후 상속인이 아님이 밝혀진 경우················································ 334
대판 1981.3.10. 80다1895
제6편 상소심 및 재심절차
[사례 194] 상소의 이익 - 전부 승소자의 상소 가부(인신손해) ································ 336
2016년 6월 법전협 모의
[사례 195] 상소의 이익 - 전부 승소자의 상소 가부(묵시적 일부청구) ················ 338
2014년 8월 법전협 모의, 2011년 변리사
[사례 196] 일부청구와 시효중단, 전부승소자의 상소 가부········································ 339
2011년 제2회 법무부모의 변형
[사례 197] 상소의 이익, 부대항소와 청구취지 확장, 부대항소의 종속성··········· 341
2011년 2014년 법무행정, 2010년 변리사
[사례 198] 상소의 이익, 부대항소와 청구취지 확장, 부대항소의 종속성··········· 343
2009년 사법시험
[사례 199] 상소불가분의 원칙, 항소심의 심판범위························································ 345
2015년 사법시험
[사례 200] 상소불가분의 원칙 - 불복하지 아니한 패소부분의 확정시기············ 347
2013년 8월 법전협 모의
[사례 201] 통상공동소송과 상소불가분의 원칙································································ 349
2012년 10월 법전협 모의
[사례 202] 불이익변경금지원칙 - 소각하판결에 대해 원고만 항소한 경우
항소법원이 청구기각판결을 할 수 있는지 여부 ······································ 351
2016년 사법시험, 2008년 법무행정고시
[사례 203] 불이익변경금지원칙 - 주위적 청구를 배척하고 예비적 청구를 인용한
판결에 대해 피고만 항소한 경우 항소심 법원이 주위적 청구를
심판대상으로 삼을 수 있는지 여부 ······························································· 352
2017년 8월 법전협 모의
[사례 204] 불이익변경금지원칙 - 주위적 청구를 배척하고 예비적 청구를 인용한
판결에 대해 피고만 항소한 경우 항소심 법원이 주위적 청구를
심판대상으로 삼을 수 있는지 여부 ······························································· 355
2014년 6월 법전협 모의
[사례 205] 불이익변경금지원칙 - 항소심에서의 상계주장·········································· 356
2015년 변리사
[사례 206] 불이익변경금지원칙 - 상계항변에 관한 판단(피고만이 항소한 경우) ·· 358
대판 1995.9.29. 94다18911
[사례 207] 파기환송판결의 기속력, 재심대상 여부························································ 360
2013년 사법시험
[판례색인]
등록된 사용후기
사용후기가 없습니다.
등록된 상품문의
상품문의가 없습니다.
◇ 회원, 비회원 모두 주문하실 수 있으며, 온라인 또는 오프라인 매장 구매(02-883-4939) 모두 가능 합니다.
◇ 주문품목을 정하신 분은 인터넷을, 자세한 상담과 함께 주문하실분은 전화상담 후 주문을 하십시오.
◇ 주문자와 입금자(무통장입금일 경우)의 성함, 주소가 다를 경우 반드시 저희 서점에 알려주시기 바랍니다.
◇ 1일 2회 이상 주문하시는 경우 택배비가 중복되어 계산되므로 한번만 계산을 하셔셔 입금을 하신 후 배송시 요구란에 반드시 묶음 배송을 요청하는 글을 남겨 주십시오.
◇ 저희서점에서 물건을 발송하는 당일날짜로 주문상태가 배송완료로 기록되며, 실제 고객 님이 상품을 수령하는 날은 배송완료 이후 1~2일(48시간) 소요됩니다.
◇ 강의용 제본교재는 비닐포장이 되지 않습니다.
배송료 및 배송기간
◇ 주문하신 도서는 대금결제가 완료된 후 재고량을 보유하고 있을 시 택배로 즉시 발송되 며, 발송 후 1~2일 내에 받아보실 수 있습니다.
◇ 단, 주문서의 품절이나 기타 사유로 배송이 늦어질 경우 메일이나 전화로 사유를 알려드 립니다.
◇ 총 합산 금액이 100,000원 이상일 경우에는 배송료가 무료이며, 100,000원 미만은 2500원이 합산되어 부과됩니다.
◇ 제주도 및 도서 지역은 별도의 비용(6,500원)이 청구됩니다. 단, 100,000원 이상 주문시 2,500원 차감된 3,000원이 청구됩니다.◇ 도서는 받으신 후 3일 이내에 교환/반품/환불이 가능하며 전화주시거나 고객님의 변심으 로 인한 교환/환불시에는 왕복 배송비를 부담하셔야 합니다.
◇ 서브노트 및 분철 주문하신 서적 등 상품 특성상 교환이나 환불이 불가능한 상품도 있음을 유의해 주십시오.
◇ 마이페이지의 [교환,환불]란에 신청해 주십시오.
◇ 교환/반품 주소: 서울시 관악구 신림로 28길 81 서점 북라인
등록된 상품이 없습니다.
